It comes as
no surprise that Romney has publically expressed disdain and disregard for the
poor Americans. His promise to repair
the social safety nets designed and implemented to protect the poor rings
extremely hollow.
The safety
nets in question include those designed to provide housing, food, health care,
education, job training, and other programs intended to keep a large segment of
the U.S. populace from falling into Dickensian conditions of poverty. The programs
called for the various states to use federal funds to administer many aspects
of the safety nets. But years of GOP
defunding along with increased need for services have left the states with
nothing to provide except reductions in levels of services. Many people now depend upon food banks and
other charities for sustenance. There is
much less charitable contribution of housing and health care. And some services can’t be and shouldn’t be
provided by charities and churches.
For instance,
family planning can be regarded as essential for purposes of mental and physical
health, housing, education, and many other common needs. However, Catholic and fundamentalist churches
are opposed to birth control in many or all form. Allowing them to limit services provided by
other charities is essentially cutting out huge segments of the social safety
nets while allowing the teavangelists to deny responsibility for reduction in
services.
Are we ready
to bring back the workhouses, perhaps under the guise of returning jobs to America? If Chinese factory workers on manual assembly
lines can pull 35 hour shifts. Are American workers any less capable?
No comments:
Post a Comment